As listeners know, I like to critique poor astronomy press releases. Part of the problem stems from writers who base entire articles on those press releases, with doing no vetting on their own. Can you imagine if political writers did that? They do? Okay, you’re making it hard to make my point, so I’ll distract you with shiny things and dangling string and get back to the topic at hand…

I want to throw a shout out to Clara Moskowitz at Wired.com for this article. It is a very simple article about naked eye astronomy this week. I find it a practically perfect astronomy piece. It doesn’t hype it but it still puts the event in perspective. It’s clear, correct and to-the-point. This conjunction was especially beautiful and I know many non-astro friends who commented on it to me. It was so well placed that the public was interested. Look at the comments she got on that post: 81 vs. the comments she got on her most recent post before that: 10. A story like hers will be a great gateway for the general public to learn a bit more - and perhaps come back later for more.

I only took points off for the obligatory Star of Bethlehem reference that every astronomy news outlet trots out every twelve months. But I can hardly fault her for getting into the Christmas spirit.

I haven’t read her stories before, so I’ve bookmarked her column and look forward to more. I checked out a couple of her most recent and they seem similarly clear, with some light humor thrown into each piece. She seems especially handy at headline writing.

Kudos to Clara. Wired, take care of her!

This is a little video from a project I’ve been working on. It’s, um, kinda-sorta related to space and stuff?

I could go on and on about Eta Car. It’s a fascinating system and one of the likely candidates for a nearby supernova in our lifetimes. For more info, a great place to start is the HST Treasury Program on Eta Carinae.

* 1664 Isaac Barrow
* 1669 Sir Isaac Newton
* 1702 William Whiston
* 1711 Nicholas Saunderson
* 1739 John Colson
* 1760 Edward Waring
* 1798 Isaac Milner
* 1820 Robert Woodhouse
* 1822 Thomas Turton
* 1826 Sir George Biddell Airy
* 1828 Charles Babbage
* 1839 Joshua King
* 1849 Sir George Stokes
* 1903 Sir Joseph Larmor
* 1932 Paul Dirac
* 1969 Sir James Lighthill
* 1979 Stephen Hawking

I wonder who is next?

PS - there’s a new podcast on the feed. Will be posting it here soon.

If you like astronomy and you like listening to podcasts then 2009 is going to be a very, very good year for you. Slacker Astronomy is going to be a strong supporter and contributor to The 365 Days of Astronomy Podcast, the Daily Podcast of the IYA.

The 365 Days of Astronomy Podcast is a project that will publish one podcast per day, 5 to 10 minutes in duration, for all 365 days of 2009. The podcast will be made available through an RSS feed. The podcast episodes will be written, recorded and produced by people around the world.
…
We are looking for individuals, schools, companies and clubs to provide 5 - 10 minutes of audio for our daily podcast. You can do as few as 1 episode or up to 12 episodes (one per month, subject, of course, to our editorial discretion). Our goal is to encourage people to sign up for a particular day (or days) of 2009.

So tell your mom, dad, child, grandfather, friend, school, troop, club or friend that you want to make one measly 10 minute podcast about astronomy to help out and, perhaps, be famous.

Ears around the world are counting on you.

So join in!

Hubble Space Telescope malfunctions, space shuttle repair mission uncertain, NASA says

I wanted to post the cartoon in this post but they probably don’t like that.

The 46 billion year part is only off by a factor of 4 or so.

In the meantime, I was thinking, it’s time to solicit openly what we’ve all been thinking — why is there no asteroid named “slacker” or “slackerastronomy”? We need some ambitious and slightly demented asteroid chaser to step up to the table and name an asteroid after us! Don’t you agree?

Cassini images reveal the existence of a faint arc of material orbiting with Saturn’s small moon Anthe.

The moon is moving downward and to the right in this perspective. In this image, most of the visible material in the arc lies ahead of Anthe (2 kilometers, 1 mile across) in its orbit. However, over time the moon drifts slowly back and forth with respect to the arc.

The arc extends over about 20 degrees in longitude (about 5.5 percent of Anthe’s orbit) and appears to be associated with a gravitational resonance caused by the moon Mimas. Micrometeoroid impacts on Anthe are the likely source of the arc material.

Andrew Fraknoi over at the ASP has put together a nice collection about women in astronomy. He describes it as “…a resource for those educators and students who wish to explore the challenges and triumphs of women [in astronomy] of the past and present.”

There are tons of really smart, really cool women astronomers doing outstanding work in astronomy. Often when you read about women in astronomy it’s about women of the past. It’s nice to see focus on today’s women astronomers. There are people like Wendy Freedman, pictured above, out there kicking professional astronomy ass as we speak.

Speaking of which, here is a YouTube video I found of one of my favorite astronomers, irrespective of gender, Dr. Roberta Humphreys, talking about women in astronomy.

Emily sums it up perfectly:

The longer I listened to the “great planet debate” last week, the more strongly I felt that if it were up to me, I would define “planet” to mean “everything in the universe that’s smaller than a star.” The fact of the matter is, every time I speak about any object visited by a spacecraft, I make frequent slips of the tongue. I call Titan a planet. I call Enceladus a planet. I’ve even called Tempel 1 a planet. They’re all wanderers, all places to visit. Subdivide it however you like — it makes sense to speak of giant (or Jovian) planets, ice giant planets, major planets, terrestrial planets, minor planets, dwarf planets, binary planets, whatever. But just look around at the people who call themselves “planetary scientists” and see what they study. It’s all of the above.

Then she goes on to show the relative sizes of some interesting “planets” in the solar system, using her interesting definition. Definitely worth a read.

We present the first resolved images of the eclipsing binary Beta Lyrae, obtained with the CHARA Array interferometer and the MIRC combiner in the H band. The images clearly show the mass donor and the thick disk surrounding the mass gainer at all six epochs of observation. The donor is brighter and generally appears elongated in the images, the first direct detection of photospheric tidal distortion due to Roche-lobe filling.

This is the beginning of a new era of imaging systems that have hitherto been observed (somewhat) indirectly. We understand systems like Beta Lyrae very, very well. But resolving the components is something new and quite exciting. The image on the right is Figure 2 from the paper and shows the images from both instruments as well as a model of the system.

So add this one to Google Reader and you’ll get a firehose of great astronomy blogging.

UPDATE: D’oh, I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed. Right now there is no RSS feed and eventually the site will be password-protected and access granted by request to editors of astro club newsletters and websites. So get it while you can!

I was going to write up a post about Polaris aka the North Star but Simostronomy beat me to it. In a nutshell, Polaris is a Cepheid variable star with a very low amplitude, so the brightness does not change very much. A new paper points out that the amplitude is increasing and Mike does a very nice job of explaining it.

One thing I like to do when under a dark sky like at a camp fire or floating in a boat is ask people to point at the North Star. Most people look for the brightest star and will point to it without giving any thought to the direction to which they are pointing! The North Star is due north of you everywhere you can see it and it is not the brightest star, by far. Its altitude above the horizon is equal to your latitude so here in Minneapolis it is 45 degrees above the horizon.

Besides it’s important (and temporary) role as the North Star, Polaris is one of the brighter Cephied stars and it appears to be going through changes in human time scales, which is always fun for astronomers.

So, thanks Mike! Now instead of blogging I can go play some Age of Conan.

If you have no idea what I’m talking about just ignore me!

The PayPal account I’m using I had set up previously and is called Tribe of Angels. It should be clear that you are donating to Slacker Astronomy but don’t get confused if you see references to Tribe of Angels.

Doug and I, with occasional contributions from Aaron, Beth, Travis and, perhaps, YOU, will continue to provide you with the road-less-traveled of astronomy news, interviews and commentary. Stay tuned and thank you for your support!

Dr. Vasily Belokurov of Cambridge University and his collaborators reveal the answer to be no in their recent submission entitled “Leo V: A Companion of a Companion of the Milky Way Galaxy” found
here. Interestingly, the head-shot of this newly discovered dwarf galaxy shows … nothing! The foreground field stars greatly outnumber the few much more distant evolved stars in the cluster and there is no visible concentration on the image.

Seems like a hard sell, but it isn’t. Belokurov’s team has mined a vast and very influential database of object brightnesses, colors, and spectra known as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and then obtained follow-up observations to confirm their discovery. The database provides the ability to select out stars from the only-slightly-fuzzy, much-more-distant background galaxies and also precise color information. This latter capability was key to the success of locating the new dwarf galaxy - its stars were sufficiently metal-poor that many of the evolved ones were so-called “blue horizontal branch” stars. The concentration of BHB stars on the sky does make this patch of sky stand out - it indicates a grouping of stars of similar age and metal abundance.

The final clincher was getting radial velocities for the handful of brightest, coolest stars in the galaxy - the so-called “red giant branch” (RGB) stars. Objects within the dwarf galaxy are only moving a few km/sec relative to each other. On the other hand, foreground field stars from the Milky Way have radial velocity differences of tens to hundreds of km/sec since they are orbiting the Milky Way’s much more massive center at various distances and on a variety of orbits. Belokurov’s team obtained 247 spectra on the 6.5m MMT telescope on Mount Hopkins in Arizona and found five RGB stars close to the dwarf galaxy center with near-identical velocities. Score!

The new pup - not to be confused with pope - christened “Leo V” is 180 kpc (about 600,000 light years) distant and is moving away from us at a speed of 132 km/sec. But that radial velocity includes a component of the Sun’s motion around the center of the Milky Way galaxy. When solar orbital component is removed, Leo V ends up moving only about 60 km/sec relative to the center of mass of Local Group galaxies.

Intriguingly, Leo V is found projected on the sky only three degrees away from a very similar beast with the very distinctive name Leo IV - also discovered by Dr. Belokurov and his collaborators! The researchers point out that the proximity of these objects in Local Group space may foreshadow additional discoveries along a stream of such apparently faint and intrinsically low-luminosity objects which could then inform our ideas of the formation of the Milky Way galaxy.

I must point out another very cool use of Local Group galaxy data. You may recall from high school or college physics that if you know velocities and positions of objects and the forces acting on them, you can predict where they were in the past and where they will be in the future. For galaxies, the force is gravity and you can get good estimates of their masses from their brightnesses (corrected by a dark matter fraction). You can also assume that at some time around 10 billion years ago, all of the present-day galaxies were essentially at rest with respect to each other. Given 1) their three-dimensional positions now, 2) their radial velocities now, and the assumption of zero initial velocities way back when, you have enough “boundary conditions” to solve each of their paths in the interim. But - and this is a big but - there is no simple way to do it! One has to try out many, many configurations of starting locations, run the system forward and see if the radial velocities and positions you end up with are similar to those we see now. If not, throw the galaxies back in the box, shake and try again! If you are interested in such games, check out the references and citations in this paper. Leo V can now be added to the list of objects used, so we now have an excuse to re-run these models!

You’ve maybe heard of cataclysmic variable stars. They are binary systems where one of the stars is stealing material from the other star due to their close proximity. This material forms a pancake around the star called an accretion disk. We’ve never imaged one of these systems but we have a very, very good theoretical model of how they work.

Every once in a while that accretion disk gets unstable and essentially blows up in what we call an outburst. Sometimes these outbursts are extra bright and carry a signature in their light curve called “superhumps”. These are large oscillations in the light curve at a period very near, but not exactly equal to, the orbital period of the system.

On 6/30/08 one of these systems, VY Aqr, went into a superoutburst. This is a fairly infrequent event for this star. The outbursts themselves happen every few years and the superoutbursts less often than that.

I was heading out to my observatory when the word came in so I slewed my fancy 0.212m telescope (doesn’t that sound more impressive than 8.3″?) and got some data. So did a few other people and I downloaded all of their data from the AAVSO. If you click the image above a light curve will open in a new window. Let me explain it to you.

This is a phase plot using the superhump period of this star (P_sh = 92.7 minutes). So anything that happens 92.7 minutes after something else is plotted at the same phase. So the X axis is the phase of the superhump period and the Y axis is the brightness of the star. Because the star is getting dimmer, each day’s data is lower on the graph than the previous day. So each night is folded upon itself but each subsequent night is below the previous night.

You can see there are some interesting things going on! The superhump amplitude and phase change over time as the systems fades.

The latest papers on this object included Doppler tomography, new parallax measurements and spectroscopy from the Hubble Space Telescope. There is a lot of interesting physics in these systems and they are the subject of on-going study by astronomers. Including me!

The AAVSO has posted their Variable Star of the Season and this time around it’s FG Sagittae, a star that has given us an opportunity to watch it evolve over human timescales, something very rare in stellar evolution.

…many papers have detailed the remarkable evolution of FG Sge from a faint, hot, blue post-asymptotic giant branch star and planetary nebula in the making to a much cooler and brighter yellow supergiant. Even more exciting for variable star observers, following FG Sge’s four-magnitude brightening and several decades of relative constancy, the star now appears to exhibit the dramatic and seemingly random fluctuations and fadings of the R Coronae Borealis class of variable stars. FG Sge is clearly a star undergoing extreme changes, and we’re fortunate to be treated to its amazing show.

If you have access to a telescope you can go take a look for yourself!

Next up, a tip jar, coming soon.

Go read up and tell us what you think!

In order of receipt by yours truly and in the own very words of the author, notwithstanding some minor editorial discretion, here, then, are the proceedings:

From Slacker Astronomy:

Hi Michael,

Here you go - hot off the keyboard!

Regulus - Just when you think you know a star

Cheers,
Doug

From astroENGINE:

Hi Fraser,

My entry:
Title: “No Doomsday in 2012: The Reason Why Science Will Not Win”

Just a brief discussion about the recent 2012 articles and why science is fighting a loosing battle against the scaremongers

Cheers, Ian

From 21st Century Waves:

Hi Fraser,
Here’s a post: State of the Wave, Friday 6/20/08

I hereby officially volunteer to host the Carnival.

Best regards…
Bruce Cordell

From Centauri Dreams:

Hi Fraser,

I’ll send “Alpha Centauri and the Long Haul“:

This one is a look at projects in human history that have involved lengthy time spans, with relation to interstellar concepts like the Ultimate Project, a multi-generational starship that might take 10,000 years to reach its destination. The idea of long-term thinking in a short-term culture is explored.

All best,

Paul

From Music of the Spheres:

GeoEye-1 and TMA Notes

Music of the Spheres looks at the soon-to-launch commercial Earth-imaging satellite GeoEye-1 and at some details of its high-resolution optics.

From Free Space:

humm …

how ’bout this for this week: Metaphysically Speaking

Congress may force NASA to fly a canceled dark matter experiment, but it’ll have to be without a rescue shuttle available.

Thanks!

Irene

From Start With A Bang!:

The Moon looks huge!!
Because who doesn’t love the moon, really?

From Space Feeds:

This week’s space video of the week is the 1997 sci-fi/fantasy film The Fifth Element.

Space Video of the Day - 080623

Ed

From Nextbigfuture:

Article Title: The Space elevator games and the lunar lander contest preview for 2008

Summary: The Space elevator power beaming (climber) competition is on Sept 27, 2008 and the lunar lander contest is Oct 24, 25 2008. The main focus is on the space elevator climber teams and the progress towards a tether.

Brian Wang

From Orbiting Frog:

Fraser,

Crikey, the sixtieth must be coming up!

My entry this week would have to be the ‘Font Sizes of the Planets‘

Thanks,
Rob

From Cumbrian Sky:

Hi,

I’d like to submit this Blog post for your consideration for this week’s Carnival, please.

Title of Post: “The future’s not orange, it’s ICY…”

Summary: As exciting and important as it was, contrary to what many media reports have claimed, Phoenix’s spotting of ice on Mars wasn’t actually a “discovery” - ice had been seen on Mars by other probes over the years. But while the celebrations got into full swing in Arizona, NASA quietly released another “icy image” that received almost no attention at all, yet illustrated something possibly even more profound, giving us a tantalising glimpse into the future of space exploration and Mankind…

Stuart Atkinson

From Dynamics of Cats:

Holy Vanishing Crumbs, Phoenix!
yet another entry on Phoenix lander stuff

From A Babe in the Universe:

Aloha Carnival!
Endeavour returned to Earth June 14 with some spectacular photos from the Space Station.
“Photos From STS-124”

Mission STS-124 successfully installed the Japanese Kibo module. Human figures work on the Station in the ultimate high-rise project. We see the Shuttle docked at the Station, and a view of a place an earlier Endeavour once charted.

Thank you for hosting this week’s Carnival.
LOUISE RIOFRIO

From: Tyler at The Planetary Society:

Hi there,
Here’s my latest astronomy blog posting for the Carnival of Space.

Stop 14: Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah

This one talks about light pollution and astronomy outreach within the national parks.

Cheers,
Tyler

From the weblog of Columbus State University’s Coca-Cola Space Science Center:

Would you like to swing ’round a star?

Thanks!
– Rosa Williams

From Jeff Gortatowsky:

Star Party season…Or also know as fire season here in California. However being optimistic, it is star party season in the northern hemisphere. Coming up next week are two big star parties in northern California. The Golden State Star Party (GSSP) and the Shingletown Star Party (SSP). Both are held in an area that is one of of the darkest yet still accessible areas of the state. GSSP is currently booked up. SSP however still has room and day/night passes are available at the gate.

(Editor’s Note: It appears that SSP is “postponed until at least the end of August 2008″, according to their web site.)

From Astroblog:

G’Day

Title of Post: The Odyssey and the Celestial Clock

Brief summary: Has the date of homers Odyssey been found using the patterns of planets in the sky?

Cheers! Ian

From Emily Lakdawalla at The Planetary Society Weblog:

Hi there,

This week I’ll change things up and suggest you link to my weekly “What’s up” post, highlighting the current activities of all 20 of the active planetary space probes in and beyond the solar system. For the curious, that list includes: MESSENGER, Venus Express, Chang’e 1, Kaguya, Spirit, Opportunity, Phoenix, 2001 Mars Odyssey, Mars Express, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, Rosetta, Stardust, Dawn, Deep Impact, Hayabusa, Genesis, Cassini, New Horizons, and Voyager 1 and 2.

Happy Mars solstice! (And Earth, too.)

What’s up in the solar system for the week of June 23

–Emily

From Catholic Sensibility:

Hi Fraser,

If it’s not too late, here’s my entry for the carnival:

Satellite Imagination 1.6: Meet The Louisians

Cheers to all at UT

Todd

From goodSchist:

Hopefully this isn’t too late:

The importance of being Ivuna

Cheers,
-Chris

From Twisted Physics

This is a neat one with great discussion - Sean Caroll over at Cosmic Variance vetted the scientific points Jennifer discusses:

Devourer of Worlds

Best,
~Dave

From Beth Katz:

Hanny’s Voorwerp is an intriguing green blob that looks very much like “The Incredible Hulk”. You, too, can explore the Galaxy Zoo.

A little closer to home, aurora watchers have been forlornly hoping that the sun will get past its solar minimum and get some sunspots. In January 2008, NASA reported that Solar Cycle 24 had started. It seems that there has been little activity since then unless you count Tiny Tims. But the STEREO spacecraft caught stereo images of twisting solar jets. Those spacecraft have some amazing images. Maybe by the time the Solar Cycle 24 Conference rolls around in December we’ll see a few more spots.

Too many clouds? Test your knowledge of lunar phases with the lunar cycle matching phase game or these lunar phase activities.

UPDATE Oh noes! I forgot one!

Did I break some rule or offend the Gods?

I sent a blog to Fraser and one to you. You said you’d pick.
Did they both suck or what?

–
Mike Simonsen
Development Director
American Association of Variable Star Observers
www.aavso.org

So…

From Simostronomy:

Hey Michael,

You may have received an entry for me for the carnival, but you might consider this one in its place.

What Are Variable Stars?

–
Mike Simonsen
Development Director
American Association of Variable Star Observers
www.aavso.org

Many thanks to the hard work and good thinking of our submitters. It’s a lot of great reading for us to digest. I’ve never hosted a carnival before so I probably did it wrong. Please be kind to my mistakes. Authors, let me know if I made any errors or omissions with your submission and I will promptly correct.

Wanna join the Carnival of Space? Just send the URL of your entry via electronic Internet email message to carnivalofspace@gmail.com.

Cheers, beers and clear skies,
Michael

Regulus is the 22nd brightest star in the sky to the naked-eye. Since it lies along the path followed by the Sun, Moon and planets (called the “ecliptic”), bright planets frequently pass close to the line of sight to this majestic star. In fact, it is so close to the ecliptic that the Sun passes within a half degree of it every August. (Don’t go looking for this event visually! If you want to see how close, check out the movie from the SOHO satellite here. The brightest object - besides the Sun! - is Saturn. Regulus pops out from behind the occulting disk right at the end of the MPEG.)

I first became more closely acquainted with Regulus during my postdoctoral fellowship at the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Victoria, British Columbia (Canada). I would frequently use the 1.2m telescope with its fantastic high-resolution spectrograph. One of the shortcomings of filament bulbs is that there is precious little light emitted at the blue end of the spectrum - if you want to calibrate the pixel-to-pixel sensitivity of your detector, you can’t get enough blue signal without saturating the red end. What to do, what to do … One fine solution is to observe a bright blue star which is rotating so quickly that all of its spectral lines are smeared out over many, many pixels. Enter Regulus! The few spectral lines in its spectrum were already broad hydrogen lines and the rotation rate of over 300 km/sec smeared them out even more. A great star for calibration.

And a very poor one for measuring the line-of-sight (”radial”) velocity using the Doppler shift! In fact, astronomers last studied it for binarity in 1912-1913 - almost a century ago! Many hot stars are far enough away that lines from interstellar gas can be used as reference points for radial velocities. Not so Regulus - it is only 24 parsecs away and there just isn’t enough gas along the line-of-sight to this neighbor of the Sun.

Regulus came back into favor when its shape and the brightness distribution could be measured by a very cool kind of optical instrument called an interferometer. Work by McAlister and collaborators using the CHARA long-baseline optical inteferometer they created on Mount Wilson found that Regulus is rotationally-flattened and it spinning at 86% of the speed at which the surface gas would cease to be bound to the star. They were able to show that it was darker along the equator of the star, too. This high rotation rate was an anomaly for a star that was as old as Regulus (apparently 150 million years - pretty old for a star of this mass) since similar stars seemed to be fast rotators only early in their lifetimes.

So Doug Gies and his collaborators embarked on a new study using modern instrumentation to see if there was any evidence of it orbiting the center-of-mass of a binary system containing it and a hitherto-unknown companion. As a bright star, there was plenty of light available to be dispersed by high-resolution spectrographs. They used several in their study including two “unusual ones” - the Kitt Peak National Observatory Coude Feed Telescope and the Multiple-Telescope Telescope!

Let me briefly describe these two instruments. A Coude room is very high-resolution spectrograph capable of tearing the light from a telescope into very fine shreds of color. It was designed to be “fed” by the 2.1m telescope at Kitt Peak. However, observatories tend to do deep imaging around the time of New Moon (i.e. when the sky is dark) and the 2.1m served a variety of such needs. It was realized that the a smaller telescope could “feed” the spectrograph during these periods and that brighter stars could be observed with that smaller telescope plus Coude spectrograph while the big telescope was busy imaging!

The Multiple-Telescope Telescope at Hard Labor Creek in Georgia is another ingenious system for bright star spectroscopy. It has nine relatively inexpensive 0.33m mirrors which focus onto nine optical fibers which then feed a stable, bench spectrograph. Since it only studies bright stars, the mirror pointings can each be individually-tweaked to center up on the bright star. It uses a cheap alt-azimuth mount and collects as much useful light as a 1.0 telescope for a tiny fraction of the cost of such a large telescope.

So - you are asking - what did Doug Gies and his collaborators find? They found that Regulus was indeed a spectroscopic binary. Once every 40.11 days, the system completes one orbit. Regulus itself has a mass of about 3.4 times that of the Sun. The companion of Regulus is much less massive - only about 0.30 solar masses. Such a small mass object is either a low-mass star or a white dwarf. The latter possibility provides an explanation for Regulus’ rapid rotation! The idea is that the companion was once the more massive member of the pair and when it finished hydrogen burning in its core, it expanded dramatically and started losing mass to Regulus in a manner which “spun it up”. A mass of 0.30 solar masses is very low for a white dwarf - such objects are found only in systems where it is clear that much mass has been transferred.

A final piece of the puzzle fell into place when spectra taken using the far-ultraviolet Spanish satellite MINISAT-01 were re-examined. When the expected contribution from Regulus was removed, light remained in the ultraviolet region of interest - consistent with a white dwarf but not a cool low-mass star. So Regulus joins the list of bright stars in the sky (which includes Sirius and Procyon) having white dwarf companions and proves once again that “three out of every two stars is a binary”!

Their paper has been accepted for publication in the prestigious Astrophysical Journal Letters.

A Spectroscopic Orbit for Regulus
Doug Gies (GSU) et al

If you’ve got a space-related blog, you should really join the carnival. Just email an entry to carnivalofspace@gmail.com, and the next host will link to it. It will help get awareness out there about your writing, help you meet others in the space community - and community is what blogging is all about.

Get thee to thy keyboard and get insightful on our asses! We need your awesomeness in our greedy little hands before June 26th, 2008.

What do you think of this?

We are entering a new age of Slacker Astronomy where we want to have the resources to travel and have support for acquiring the technology necessary to make interviews and other podcasts possible.

There are 2 main choices for this, that I know of:

1. Accept advertising
2. Solicit donations from listeners
3. All of the above

The only other possibility I can think of is a kinder, gentler version of #1 as is done by NPR and the like.

I think experience has shown that #2 is a hard nut to crack. People will show occasional financial support some of the time, but in terms of having on on-going revenue stream to support operations, everyone I know who makes money makes it via #1.

Which I think is both good and bad. The bad is web sites and RSS feeds which are littered with advertising. On some sites it is literally hard to find the content among the ads. Ads are annoying and advertisers getting more annoying all the time.

The good news is — I’m as reluctant to write checks as you are! If Meade or Swinburne can foot the bill, it makes it easier, in a way, for everyone. Most advertisers in the science/astronomy world are pretty good so you usually aren’t presented annoying, distasteful ads.

The bottom line for everyone doing podcasting and video podcasting is that you can achieve more with more resources at your disposal. So to the extent we want to do more and should do more, a little funding becomes important.

So brace yourself, I guess, for one of the above! We do want to do more with Slacker Astronomy so we will be thinking of ways to increase the resources at our disposal.

I had heard of Chris Lintott but I didn’t really know why. It turns out he is an astronomical celebrity in the UK due to his work on The Sky At Night. He is also one of the main people behind the very clever crowdsourcing project called Galaxy Zoo.

To the right is a photo of Chris and I at the AAS Meeting in St. Louis where we co-presented on several IYA New Media discussions and panels. We also drank a little too much one evening but on that subject I will say no more…

He was in Saint Louis and we had a lot of laughs. Apparently hanging out with me, Aaron, Phil, Pamela and Chris was infectious because Mike got home and started a blog: Simostronomy. Check it out!

Our friends Pamela Gay, Nancy Atkinson and Phil Plait have all the latest from this week’s meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Saint Louis.

I have a whole bunch of great video that I’ll be uploading in the next few days or weeks as well.

Interview: Rick Fienberg of Sky and Telescope (MP4, 42.8MB, 5:50)

I just came back from the astro-drinking-blogger meetup. It was a lot of fun. With apologies to the people my brain is too dim to name individually, there was a very nice group of people there including Phil, Pamela, Chris, Sean, Nick and Nancy.

I’ve had a couple of beers, if you’ll excuse me, but we are really lucky to have such a thriving and friendly community of astro-blogging. Note I don’t mean the bloggers, I mean you, the people who enjoy reading about astronomy.

The life astronomy improves is your own. I hear over and over from people — one of the major joys of astronomy are the human connections that we weave together. Understanding the universe is a compelling and important goal and I don’t understand why all people aren’t astronomers. Then I remember — they are. Everyone loves astronomy because you have to be bat-sh*t crazy to not appreciate the wonder, beauty and complexity of the universe.

So here’s a toast to you, Mr. and Ms. Astronomy Enthusiast. We aren’t just on a quest, we are on a quest together. It’s a lot of fun.

From AAS in St. Louis.

This is a walk through Pamela Gay’s very lovely house during a party she threw for astronomers in town for the AAS meeting. Who can you spot?

So limber up your pint lifting arm and c’mon down to the KitchenK Restaurant at 7pm on Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008.

So go visit the the 56th Carnival of Space! Maybe the Slackers can host it one of these days…

I upgraded the wiki software that runs Slackerpedia Galactica. Everything seems to be working OK. We had problems before where people couldn’t register as new users. I just tested that and it seems to work fine. Let me know if you have a different experience.

Let me say, the Slackerpedia Galactica astronomy wiki is really cool! It’s entertaining and informative and I don’t know of anything else like it. So please, take another look, add some articles, edit some articles and have some fun.

We also have a very simple Slackerpedia Galactica Facebook app.

Let’s bring it back to life. C’mon, everyone, follow me!

A Friendly Reminder: Spyside, the rock-duo featuring Ken Gardiner and Travis Searle (http://www.myspace.com/spysideband), appears this weekend on the television talent showcase “Community Auditions: Star of the Day” - http://www.communityauditions.com.

You have a few chances to watch, depending on where you are. For those not in the Boston/Providence/Portland area, we’re told that clips of individual performances will be available online at the Community Auditions website. (See URL above.)

FRIDAY MAY 16th -
9:30pm on TV38 WSBK Boston

SATURDAY MAY 17th -
10:30pm on WPXT The CW Portland, Maine
Midnight on WBZ-TV CBS Boston

SUNDAY MAY 18th -
Noon on TV38 WSBK Boston
7:30pm on NECN Boston Area

VOTE FOR US.
Voting is active from Friday after the episode premiers and lasts until airs to the following Friday morning, May 23rd. Votes count toward being included in the final episodes, where contestants compete for a car and a professionally produced record. **Everyone should vote as much as they can all week. Seriously. There’s no limit to how often or how many times you can vote, whether you saw the show or not.** Plus, voting is easy! You can do it in your spare time! Again, the website is:http://www.communityauditions.com/.

Feel free to pass this news on to any and all who might be interested. Thanks for the support!

–
TS/KG

Hell, just email us and we’ll help you pick out a great star. You want something hot? Massive? With or without a companion? Would you like an accretion disk with that? Or some planets perhaps?

Go ahead, name a star. Just don’t pay for it.

Whatever the hell is Slacker Astronomy (MP3, 17MB, 18:30)

As always, we welcome your feedback so email us if anything comes to mind.

Our own Doug Welch wrote a very nice article in the latest issue of Sky and Telescope called “How to Hunt for Supernova Fossils in the Milky Way“. I can’t find a link to the article itself but S&T has a post about the article.

It’s really cool stuff — an accidental discovery of supernova light echos in the LMC has led to a new way to look for and study supernovae here in our own galaxy.

Doug discusses in detail how you can help hunt for these elusive light echoes. It would be a great multi-year project for a small college astronomy program or for accomplished astrophotographers with a bunch of really nice equipment.

Doug also describes in the article what happens if you find a light echo:

What happens if you find a candidate light echo? You become my new best friend!

How can you pass that up?!?

Your driving down the road in an automobile. You have an odometer in the car which tells you how far you’ve gone (x). You have a speedometer which tells you how fast you are going (v). When you punch the gas pedal or hit the brakes, your car accelerates (a), getting faster or slower. All of these quantities are related through calculus. Let’s say you start at x=0 and drive at v=40 miles per hour for t=15 minutes.

x = vt
x = (40mph*0.25 hours)=10 miles

We can write this as x/t = v. The velocity is the ratio of the change in position (x) to the change in time (t).

In math instead of saying “change in x” we say “delta-x” . In calculus we take this delta to be infinitely small and instead of saying “delta-x” we say “dee-x” (and write dx). So when I write dx I just mean a ridiculously small change in position. dt means an instantaneously small slice of time. The equation v=x/t can be written with this notation as v=dx/dt. This means the same thing as above, it’s the same definition of velocity, but we are implying these infinitely small deltas.

Another way of saying dx/dt is to say “the time derivative of x”. This just means “how x changes with time”. If we assume that we are talking about time we can use a shorthand which means “how x changes with time” and that shorthand is simply a single apostrophe like this: x’.

Now we can write our equation above like this:

v = x’

But your velocity can change over time, too. If you are going 40 mph and accelerate to 60 mph, your velocity changes as a function of time.

v = at

For some length of time (t) you accelerated at a rate (a) and your new velocity is your original velocity plus (a) times (t). If we rewrite:

a = v/t

and using our notion of infinitely small deltas:

a = dv/dt

we find that (a) has the same relationship to (v) that (v) had to (x) and thus

a = v’ = x”

So we have:

x The position
x’ The velocity
x” The acceleration

The velocity is referred to as the “first derivative of x” and the acceleration is referred to as the “second derivative of x”. These derivatives have a mathematical relationship that is beyond the scope of this article.

Now to differential equations. These are equations where we see complicated relationships between values and their derivatives. An example is a falling object (m) reaching terminal velocity due to wind resistance. The force on this object (F=ma) is the difference between the gravity (g) of Earth pulling it down (-mg) and the wind resistance (k) getting stronger as the object falls faster (kv):

ma = kv - mg

For simlicity we divide by m and just let k = k/m:

a = kv - g

and now use our fancy notation from above:

x” = kx’ - g

or equivalently:

v’ = kv - g

In this equation the change in velocity is a function of the velocity itself. So to know the acceleration you need to know the velocity but to know the velocity you need to know the acceleration!

This is the conundrum of differential equations. Finding functions that, when you find their derivative, give themselves back.

If you solve the equation v’ = kv - g the answer you get is the velocity as a function of time. If you plug in a very long time, the velocity reaches a limiting value — the terminal velocity.

You can’t really solve this problem without differential equations. It turns out there are many, many things in the real world, in physics, biology and engineering, that can be explained with differential equations. From orbits to population growth to thermodynamics, differential equations are actually quite useful.

Congratulations if you stuck with me! If you guys are interested we can talk a little about differential equations in astronomy next time.

Thank you!

We have a new show in the works.

Michael

So, cheers, my brethren. Please toast my absence with proper British ale. For you dear r