What is a planet?
By Michael on August 21, 2008 at 3:01 am | In Blog Posts |The longer I listened to the “great planet debate” last week, the more strongly I felt that if it were up to me, I would define “planet” to mean “everything in the universe that’s smaller than a star.” The fact of the matter is, every time I speak about any object visited by a spacecraft, I make frequent slips of the tongue. I call Titan a planet. I call Enceladus a planet. I’ve even called Tempel 1 a planet. They’re all wanderers, all places to visit. Subdivide it however you like — it makes sense to speak of giant (or Jovian) planets, ice giant planets, major planets, terrestrial planets, minor planets, dwarf planets, binary planets, whatever. But just look around at the people who call themselves “planetary scientists” and see what they study. It’s all of the above.
Then she goes on to show the relative sizes of some interesting “planets” in the solar system, using her interesting definition. Definitely worth a read.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
17 queries. 0.288 seconds.
Powered by WordPress with jd-nebula theme design by John Doe.




I don’t have the time to read Emily’s Planetary Society blog every day, but I enjoy it and learn something every time I read it. That is a great post. The comparative photo is wonderful. Thank you for pointing us there.
In my spare time (none), I should make sure each of the bodies mentioned have an entry in Slackerpedia Gallactica.
I like her naming solution. Essentially, it forces us to use another term for the major planets and lets us use the more general term generally.
Comment by bethkatz17582 — August 21, 2008 #
What a great point she made. When that whole debate of whether or not Pluto was a planet or not gave me a headache. The naming convention she puts forward just makes so much sense.
Comment by astronomyisfun — October 2, 2008 #